BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- North Korean caught secretly mining bitcoin rival
- IPO Timelines Cut by 80% After SEC's Private Filing Decision
- How the Carried Interest Break Survived the Tax Bill
- FINRA: The Neutral Corner
- Coinbasex Says Buying and Selling Temporarily Disabled Amid Price Rout
- Bitcoin plunges by more than a third in a single day
- Goldman Is Setting Up a Cryptocurrency Trading Desk
- Jefferies Lets Employees Choose When to Receive Their Bonuses
- UBS Told to Pay $903K After Losing Retaliation Verdict
- BEWARE: Long Island Iced Tea Shares Soar After Changing Name to Long Blockchain
- Gary Cohn’s Last Laugh: Cashing Out on Trump’s Tax Plan
- E*Trade Lets Customers Trade in CBOE Bitcoin Futures
- Swiss Find Serious Shortcomings at JPMorgan in 1MDB Case
- Washington-based Investment Adviser and His Business Partner Charged in Multi-Million Dollar Scheme
- FINRA Board of Governors Meeting
- Cryptocurrency Market Now Doing Same Daily Volume as the NYSE
- Jailed Barclays Trader Must Pay $400,000 From Libor Profits
- Trump Asks ‘How’s Your 401(k)?’ But Most Voters Don’t Have One
- A Bitcoin Hedge Fund’s Return: 25,004% (That Wasn’t a Typo)
- Madoff Victims Near Full Recovery of Principal With Payout
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Rules & Regulations
AML for RIA’s – A View From the (Other) Bridge
[Photo: by M.V. Jantzen / Flickr]
No sooner did we conclude that SEC-registered investment advisors (RIAs) will likely get a pass from having to implement a money laundering program, than we are advised to the contrary by, of all people, Nick Morgan and Art Zwickel of Paul Hastings, from whom we quoted in the earlier article. [Click on: What’s Happening with the Proposed AML Requirements for RIA’s].
Go figure. But all seriousness aside, Financialish appreciates the opportunity to consider opposing viewpoints.
AML experts now believe that the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN, is moving ahead with its long awaited proposed money laundering rule, which has languished in Washington since August 2015, and is likely to become the law. Even in the current deregulatory environment of the Republican White House and Congress.
HOW’S THAT POSSIBLE? Without trying to ferret out the reasons for the rule’s nearly 2-year delay, the current regulatory does not necessarily pertain to matters involving emergency situations and national security. Which would mean that any rules that deal with money laundering and anti-terrorist financing would be exempt from the rule freeze or deregulation.
This position is confirmed by Stephanie Brooker with Gibson Dunn, who previously served was Enforcement Director with FinCen. Ms. Brooker said: “I think the view of most people in the bank secrecy-AML community is that this area of the law is perhaps less likely to be subject to deregulation in the new administration, given that it does focus on money laundering and anti-terrorist financing.” And she added: “We continue to advise clients at my firm that having a good overall know-your-customer AML program ... is a good idea.”
Eric Kringel, the Bank Secrecy Act specialist at the SEC Enforcement, agrees that the rule is likely to materialize, in part because of the Trump administration’s emphasis on combating terrorism, but also because it appears to be nearing the end of a long development process.
Under FinCEN’s proposed rule, the SEC would assume responsibility for examining advisers’ AML programs, which I no small assignment, given the agency’s already tight schedule, reduced budget, and Commissioner vacancies. That said, the true burden of responsibility would fall on investment advisers registered with the SEC. Banks, broker-dealers, mutual funds and insurance companies already are subject to the rules.