Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 

 

 

 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

ABOUT FINANCIALISH

We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.

 

Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.

 

SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS

FOLLOW US

Archive

Anti-Money Laundering Charges Filed Against Firm

February 22, 2011
CA-based Glendale Securities agreed to pay $45K  to settle FINRA charges it failed to adequately implement or enforce its antimoney laundering (AML) compliance program and otherwise comply with its AML obligations - at issue were customers's suspicious penny stock sales and large cash transfers.  It's alleged that:
  • Glendale didn't identify and analyze numerous transactions to determine if they were suspicious and were required to be reported to the FinCEN on Form SAR-SF, Suspicious Activity Report - Securities/Futures Form. 
  • Glendale permitted foreign corporate accounts, all of which were controlled by one individual, to deposit a total of approximately 279 million shares of low-priced securities and/or penny stocks into the accounts and, after the securities were deposited into the accounts, they were promptly sold and all proceeds from the transactions were disbursed by wires to 1st-party bank accounts maintained with a Scotland bank. 
  • Glendale permitted these suspicious activities to occur without conducting adequate AML reviews and failed to file Forms SAR-SF as appropriate.
  • Glendale had no WSP's to detect and prevent participation in an unregistered distribution of securities. 

FINRA further alleges that:
  • Glendale had no WSP's for the acceptance of securities in either certificate or electronic form, along with the corresponding sales of those securities;  the firm relied primarily on transfer agents to determine whether the securities were free trading.
  • Upon receipt of a large block of a low-priced stock - in certain instances, unregistered - Glendale's essentially limited its due diligence to verifying that the security was electronically quoted and contacting the transfer agent to determine the number of outstanding shares and whether the shares were free trading. 
  • Among other things, Glendale failed to inquire about the length of time the securities had been held;  - how, when, and under what circumstances the securities had been acquired; the relationship, if any, between the customer and the issuer; and/or how much stock was owned by or under the customer’s control.

This is FINRA Cases #2009019747601/20060075263 - and was reported in:  [FINRA Disc. Actions for February].