Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 

 

 

 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

ABOUT FINANCIALISH

We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.

 

Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.

 

SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS

FOLLOW US

Archive

Broker-Dealer Fined for Mishandling its RRs/RIAs

May 24, 2011

UVEST Financial Services Group, based in Charlotte, NC, agreed to settle FINRA charges that it failed to comply with its obligations for registered reps who operated registered investment advisory (RIA) programs.  These individuals were dually-registered as representatives and RIAs, had assets under management in excess of $350 million, and maintained brokerage accounts for their advisory clients away from the firm - ans participated in the execution of securities transactions through broker-dealers other than UVEST, involving mostly equity investments. 

The problems centered around the fact that UVEST regarded these programs as separate and apart from the firm - i.e., as outside business activities, that were not affiliated with the firm.  As a result ... the firm failed to comply with its obligations under NASD Rule 3040 - including:

  • obligations to supervise registered representative/investment adviser (RR/IA)s’ participation in the securities transactions executed through broker-dealers other than the firm;
  • obligations to establish, maintain and enforce a supervisory system to supervise the RR/IA activities reasonably designed to provide an understanding of the nature of the services provided by its RR/IAs, the scope of each RR/IA’s authority, and the suitability of the transactions in which the RR/IA participated;  
  • needless to say, the firm's WSPs did not specifically address supervision of the securities activities of outside RIAs until a later date.
  • obligations to record the transactions executed away from the firm in its books and records.

The firm was fined $75,000.  This is FINRA Case #2008012048601.    [Disciplinary Action for May 2011]