BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- SEC Charges Additional Defendant in Fraudulent ICO Scheme
- Warren Buffett Simply Blew it on Wells Fargo Stock: Dick Bove (Video)
- Barclays and Deutsche Bank to Lag U.S. Trading Peers
- NY AG Schneiderman Seeks to Close Loophole That Could Let Trump Pardons Block State Charges
- 'Fearless Girl' is Moving to NYSE After Year Staring Down 'Charging Bull'
- What's In Your Wallet - American Express Shares Soar After Earnings Release
- Deutsche Bank's Executive Departures Continue Following Change in CEO
- Reflections of an Economist Commissioner (SEC's Piwowar)
- Billionaire HF Manager and The Fed Chair Runner-Up are Investing in New Cryptocurrency
- Court Finds 2 Brokers Liable for Fraud Involving Mortgage-Backed Securities
- One FINRA: An Organization’s Commitment to Diversity and Inclusion
- 2018 GASB Accounting Support Fee to Fund the Governmental Accounting Standards Board
- Barclays Eyes Move Into Cryptocurrency Trading
- Goldman Breaks From Wall Street Pack with Bond-Trading Boom
- Janney Montgomery Scott CEO Joins FINRA Board of Governors
- SEC Encourages Investors to Do Background Checks on Investor.gov
- The Martin Act: Wall Street Titan Takes Aim at Law That Tripped Him Up
- Bank of America’s Cost-Cutting Drive Pushes Profit to Record
- Larry Fink: Wall Street’s $6 Trillion Man Finally Worth $1Bn
- Activist Investor Wants Barclays Investment Banking Overhaul (Video)
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Broker Learns Hard Lesson While Trying to Protect Clients
by Howard Haykin
Jeffrey Scheibner agreed to a $5K fine and a 3-month suspension to settle FINRA charges that he made unauthorized mutual fund exchanges in numerous customer accounts.
BACKGROUND. Scheibner, a resident of Ladera Ranch, CA, entered the securities industry in 1994, when he became associated with Lincoln Financial Securities as an Investment Company Shares and Variable Contracts Representative. He remained with Lincoln for 17 years, until 2012. Over the next 4 years, he was associated in that same capacity with 2 firms, including Accelerated Capital Group. Scheibner has no prior disciplinary history.
FINRA FINDINGS. Scheibner is charged with having violated FINRA Rule 2010 by making unauthorized mutual fund exchanges in the accounts of numerous customers during August and September 2015. Between 8/24/15 and 9/16/15, Scheibner exchanged 303 mutual fund positions into corresponding money market funds on behalf of 27 customers, across 36 accounts, during a period of market fluctuation. Scheibner did so without the prior authorization of the customers, and he possessed no written discretionary authority over their accounts. Scheibner received no compensation as a result of the transactions, and there were no fees to enact the exchanges.
Scheibner Response (on CRD): I was trying to save my client from a huge market downturn by transferring mutual funds to money market. These trades were done without fees. I thought I was doing the right thing for my clients. I learned a hard lesson about getting everything in writing when it comes to trades.
FINANCIALISH TAKE AWAYS. Giving this broker a 3-month suspension is overkill and, if I were representing Mr. Scheibner, I’d fight “tooth and nail” to have the sanctions mitigated – although his defense would largely rest on the issue of whether his clients were aware of the transactions and had, in fact, approved them – at some point in time. If they were aware of, and at some point approved, the trades, then I would have called upon the clients to provide testimony on Scheibner’s behalf.
And, where was Accelerated Capital Group and its supervisory personnel? Should the firm be cited for not acting on a host of red flags – that would pop up after one broker liquidated 303 mutual fund positions in his client accounts? YES! And if the firm or its supervisors had a problem with the trades – which I presume they didn’t because clients’ accounts remained invested in cash for nearly one month – why didn’t they have them reversed – at the expense of the broker?
These are the types of questions that FINRA fails to answer in its disciplinary reports – but ones that would have a greater educational value for all interested parties.
This case was reported in FINRA Disciplinary Actions for June 2017.
For details on this case, go to ... FINRA Disciplinary Actions Online, and refer to Case #2016051534901.