BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Company Reputations: 10 Best and 10 Worst in America
The financial industry is well represented - landing 6 major firms on these lists.
[ by Howard Haykin ]
Reputations are essential yet fragile assets. Just one day after C-I reported that UBS was at risk of losing its most valuable asset - its reputation - due, in large part,to a pattern of regulatory fines and sanctions incurred by the investment banking unit, and highly publicized by the media.
It is coincidental that on Friday, 24/7 Wall Street published on-line the names of publicly-traded companies with the Best Reputations and with the Worst Reputations. A "Top 10" List and a "Bottom 10" list. The rankings were compiled fomr a recent survey conducted by Harris Interactive. In its 14th annual Reputation Quotient (RQ) survey, Harris Interactive rated 60 large American companies based on 6 key characteristics, including: (i) product quality, (ii) trust, (iii) social responsibility, and, (iv) how employees are treated.
Executive Summary of Results.
Many of the companies with the highest scores are in the tech industry. Tech, explained Harris Interactive EVP For Reputation Management Robert Fronk, has a natural advantage over other industries because of the industry’s focus on innovation and customer satisfaction. However, added Fronk, “in order for these companies to make our list, like Apple, Google, and Amazon.com did, they had to go above and beyond.”
Apple, for example, has created entirely new product categories, introducing the iPhone and iPad. Google has expanded from simply being in the search engine business to creating hardware, software and even reaching to entertainment. “All three of those companies have kept the best of tech, but have also transcended,” Fronk added.
At the other end of the spectrum, there are six financial services companies among the 10 companies with the worst reputations. Unlike tech companies, which consumers expect to take risks, these companies earn their respect from being safe and stable. Unfortunately for companies like AIG, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, explained Fronk, they took risks and tried to innovate, and when the financial system nearly collapsed, these companies lost a tremendous amount of respect from the public. “As a whole, the industry is now perceived so negatively because they gave up” the stability that the public wanted.
Fronk explained why financial performance was one of the key metrics in this study. Not only are good finances necessary to achieve other reputations components, such as creating a good workplace environment and social responsibility, but good finances are themselves important to a company’s reputation. “People respect companies that outperform their competition.” Many of the best-ranked companies certainly fit that description, particularly top-ranked Amazon.com, which has turned not just the online retail business, but the entire retail industry, on its head.
While financials are important, Fronk explained, it is often the first and only thing companies and analysts look at to measure success. Many of the companies with the worst reputations actually have sound balance sheets. AIG, which received the worst reputation score this year, saw its share price rise by over 45% in the past 12 months. Financials are important in the long term, Fronk pointed out, but in order to be successful in the Harris survey, a company needs to build a strong reputation and not just focus on the bottom line.
In its 2013 RQ study, Harris Interactive asked respondents which companies were the most visible in the past few months. The company then ranked the 60 most visible companies based on responses to six categories: social responsibility, emotional appeal, products and services, vision and leadership, financial performance and workplace environment. Among the data 24/7 Wall St. considered when reviewing these companies were brand rankings from Brand Z and InterBrand, consumer satisfaction scores from the American Consumer Satisfaction Index, as well as MSN Money/JZ Analytics’ 2012 Customer Service Survey. We also considered company financial information, obtained for the most recent period available through Yahoo! Finance unless otherwise noted. We reviewed stock price performance data from Google Finance and employee satisfaction and CEO ratings came from Glassdoor.
The winners and losers are posted below. As noted above, financial firms were shut out of the Best Reputation Group, but they more than made up for it in spades in the Lower Bracket. And there are even a couple of surprise placements.
Firms With Best Reputations.
- Amazon
- Apple (#1 in 2012)
- Disney
- Johnson & Johnson
- Coca-Cola
- Whole Foods Market
- Sony
- Procter & Gample
- Costco
To see what makes these companies the best and to understand how and why their statistics play a major role, go to: [Ten Companies with Best Reputations in America].
Firms with the Worst Reputations.
- American International Underwriters (AIG)
- Goldman Sach Group
- Halliburton
- American Airlines
- Bank of America
- Citigroup
- BP (British Petroleum)
- JPMorgan Chase
- Wells Fargo
- Comcast
Of the 10 companies with the worst reputations, financial firms hold 6 places. Disgraceful. C-I presents in a separate posting, the capsule summaries and statistics for each of the 6 financial firms. Alternatively you can read those commentaries on the links below.
To see what makes these companies the worst, and to understand how and why their statistics play a major role, go to: [Ten Companies with Worst Reputations in America].
For further details, go to: [ 24/ 7 Wall Street, 1/15/13 ].

