BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Ex-Dewey Partner Sues Firm: Alleges Ponzi Scheme
June 14, 2012
[ by Melanie Gretchen ]
The Dewey & LeBoeuf bankruptcy process has hit a roadblock. Less than 3 weeks after the New York law firm filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy on 5/28/12, a former partner has sued the firm's management team and several partners, including former chairman Steven Davis and global litigation chair Jeffrey Kessler [see WHO'S NEWS story, "Dewey Hopes to Resolve Bankruptcy Quickly"].
Complaint. Describing the firm's structure as "a Ponzi scheme," Harry Bunsow, who joined Dewey in 2011, claims that Dewey misrepresented the financials and pushed partners to make capital investments in the firm, which Dewey & LeBoeuf never intended to repay. The "conspiracy" began in 2008, Mr. Bunsow said, after the merger of Dewey Ballantine and LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae. According to the complaint filed in San Francisco Superior Court, clauses therein forced the firm to extend large compensation packages to certain partners.
As revenue declined during the financial crisis, problems exacerbated by the multi-year obligations, prompted senior partners to cover problems by inflating its numbers to the media and withholding information from employees, the complaint said. The firm told the monthly magazine, American Lawyer, that it made gross revenue of $935 million in 2011 and profit of $335 million. In fact, the firm made $781.5 million in revenue and profit of $252.5 million, the claim said.
Firm Investment to Partners. In addition, Mr. Bunsow claimed Dewey's partners forced him to make capital investments in the firm as a condition of his employment – while knowing that the money would never be repaid. Rather than going into the firm, the $1.8 million he invested was disbursed to current partners to fulfill the firm’s compensation obligations, he alleges:
"Defendants never intended to return the departing partners’ capital investments, but rather intended to selectively distribute said capital to themselves and others, thereby denying the return of capital to most of the departing partners. This way, defendants used partner capital investments as a form of revenue to enrich themselves and to hide the dire condition of the firm from the public."
For further details, go to [Dealbook, 4/27/12].

