BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- SEC Adopts Statement and Interpretive Guidance on Public Company Cybersecurity Disclosures
- SEC Charges Former Bitcoin Exchange and Its Founder With Fraud
- JPMorgan Chase to Replace NYC Headquarters with 70-Story Skyscraper
- Citigroup Raises CEO Corbat's Pay 48% to $23Mn
- Should Congress Create a Crypto-Cop?
- JPMorgan Weighs Buying an Exchange-Traded Funds Firm
- Hey, Goldman Sachs: Wanna Buy BNY Mellon?
- SEC Order Rejecting Acquisition of Chicago Stock Exchange (CSX) by Chinese-Baesd Company
- Kyle Moffatt Named Chief Accountant in SEC CorpFinance
- SEC Suspends Trading in 3 Issuers Claiming Involvement in Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technology
- Karen Garnett, Assoc. Director of SEC CorpFinance, to Leave After 23 Years of Service
- Louisiana Adviser Barred for Hiding Losses from Investors
- Connecticut HF Manager Illegally Diverted Investor Money - Now Owes Nearly $13Mn
- White House Cleaning House of Advisors Without Full Security Clearance
- Goldman Projects 30% Growth in Wealth Management Advisor Force
- Whistleblower Alleges Manipulation of CBOE Volatility Index
- FINRA Looking Into VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) Manipulation: WSJ
- Atlanta-Area Resident Charged with Misusing Investor Funds - SEC
- FINRA Announces 2018 West Region Networking Seminar
- Alberto Arevalo, Associate Director in Office of International Affairs, to Retire From SEC
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
FINRA ‘Mutual Fund Waiver Sweep’ – Part 3
by Howard Haykin
While FINRA ordered each of the 12 broker-dealers to compensate impacted customers for actual estimated excess sales charges and 12b-1 fees – totaling nearly $11 million, plus pre-judgment interest – only 3 of the firms were hit with fines, totaling $195,000.
- Investment Centers of America ($60,000);
- National Planning Corp. Investment Centers of America ($60,000);
- SII Investments ($75,000).
What did these 3 firms do to warrant fines in addition to the orders to pay restitutions and pre-judgment interest? Apparently, NOTHING!
Fact is, FINRA praised these 3 firms, as well as the other 9 firms, in each respective AWC Letter with the following notation [bold emphasis provided by Financialish]:
In resolving this matter, FINRA has recognized the extraordinary cooperation of [Firm Name] for having:
(1) initiated, prior to detection or intervention at the Firm by a regulator, an investigation to identify whether Eligible Customers received sales charge waivers during the relevant period;
(2) promptly established a plan of remediation for Eligible Customers who did not receive appropriate sales charge waivers;
(3) promptly self-reported to FINRA;
(4) promptly taken action and remedial steps to correct the violative conduct; and,
(5) employed subsequent corrective measures, prior to detection or intervention at the Firm by a regulator, to revise its procedures to avoid recurrence of the misconduct.
FINANCIALISH TAKE AWAYS. The only apparent mistake these 3 firms made was to be the first firms caught by FINRA with having “cheated” retirement plan and charitable organization customers on Mutual Fund Fee Waivers. In my opinion, these firms' cases should have been handled in a similar manner in which FINRA handled the latter 9 cases - even if means retroactive reversal of fines.
Would you seek reimbursement from FINRA for if your firm had been unfairly sanctioned?
Shouldn't firms have the right to seek (partial) reversal of sanctions if, in the months following their AWC Letters, they learned that others were held to a different standard?
Financialish.com believes the above 3 firms have rights and a valid argument. It's up to them to exercise those rights.