BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
FINRA: New Procedures for Late Disclosure Fees
August 20, 2012
[ by Howard Haykin ]
Be Sure Your Firm or Client is not Overcharged By FINRA.
Effective 8/13/12 - meaning, it's already in force - FINRA has new procedures for application of the late disclosure fee, as pertaining to the reporting of judgment/lien events on Forms U4. The procedures are governed by Section 4(h) of Schedule A to the FINRA By-Laws.
With the change, FINRA requests member firms, when reporting such events, to provide on Form U4 the date the registered person learned of the judgment/lien. The late disclosure fee will be based on that date.
Basic Requirements. Member firms are required to report when a registered person becomes subject to an unsatisfied judgment or lien - in response to Question 14M on Form U4. FINRA By-Laws require that firms report such matters within 30 days of having learned of the facts or circumstances giving rise to the event - i.e., the filing of the judgment or lien). Member firms that fail to do so in a timely manner are subject to a late disclosure fee.
Incorrect Late Disclosure Fees. It's come to FINRA's attention that firms have been assessed incorrect late disclosure fees. The error lies in the fact that the assessment has been computed using the date of filing of the judgment or lien - because, when a firm reports such matters, they firms are required to provide in Section 4 of the Form U4 Judgment/Lien Disclosure Reporting Page (DRP) the date the judgment or lien was filed.
Yet, late disclosure fee assessments should be based on the date on which the representative learned of the judgment or lien - not the date such judgment or lien was filed. Surprisingly, the DRP does not currently elicit in a discrete data field the date the registered person learned of the judgment or lien. This means FINRA would never obtain the necessary information to compute accurate late disclosure fees. FINRA notes that many member firms were instructed to contact FINRA staff if they believed the late disclosure fee was assessed in error.
New Procedures Implemented to Correct the Errors. As noted above, beginning last week, on 8/13/12, FINRA requests that member firms provide - in addition to the date, the judgment/lien was filed in Section 4 of the DRP - the date the registered person learned of the judgment/lien in Section 8 of the DRP (a free-text section), if it differs from the date provided in Section 4.
FINRA assures its member firm that if they provide a date in Section 8 of the DRP, FINRA staff will review the information provided by the member firm to determine whether a
filing is late based on the date the registered person learned of the judgment/lien and,
if it is late, will assess the late disclosure fee based on that date.
Published Guidelines. FINRA has published guidance regarding how firms should report judgment/lien events at Forms U4 and U5 Interpretive Questions & Answers (Question 14M). Questions regarding this Notice should be directed to the Gateway Call Center at (301) 869-6699.
[FINRA INFO NOTE, 8/17/12]

