BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- North Korean caught secretly mining bitcoin rival
- IPO Timelines Cut by 80% After SEC's Private Filing Decision
- How the Carried Interest Break Survived the Tax Bill
- FINRA: The Neutral Corner
- Coinbasex Says Buying and Selling Temporarily Disabled Amid Price Rout
- Bitcoin plunges by more than a third in a single day
- Goldman Is Setting Up a Cryptocurrency Trading Desk
- Jefferies Lets Employees Choose When to Receive Their Bonuses
- UBS Told to Pay $903K After Losing Retaliation Verdict
- BEWARE: Long Island Iced Tea Shares Soar After Changing Name to Long Blockchain
- Gary Cohn’s Last Laugh: Cashing Out on Trump’s Tax Plan
- E*Trade Lets Customers Trade in CBOE Bitcoin Futures
- Swiss Find Serious Shortcomings at JPMorgan in 1MDB Case
- Washington-based Investment Adviser and His Business Partner Charged in Multi-Million Dollar Scheme
- FINRA Board of Governors Meeting
- Cryptocurrency Market Now Doing Same Daily Volume as the NYSE
- Jailed Barclays Trader Must Pay $400,000 From Libor Profits
- Trump Asks ‘How’s Your 401(k)?’ But Most Voters Don’t Have One
- A Bitcoin Hedge Fund’s Return: 25,004% (That Wasn’t a Typo)
- Madoff Victims Near Full Recovery of Principal With Payout
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
FINRA Priorities:Quarterly Disciplinary Review, July 2017 (Part 2 of 2)
Want a sneak peek into FINRA’s disciplinary priorities - besides what you get from the Financialish.com ‘What Went Wrong’ case studies? Okay, here’s FINRA’s quarterly review, which highlights a sampling of recent disciplinary actions involving registered representatives.
The sample includes settled matters and decisions in litigated cases (National Adjudicatory Council (NAC) decisions and SEC decisions in FINRA cases), and falls under the following topics: [we present #'s 1-4 in yesterday's post, and #'s 5-9 in today's post]
Participating in Undisclosed Private Securities Transactions and Making False Statements on Annual Compliance Questionnaires
Making Unsuitable Recommendations
Borrowing Funds From a Customer Without Notifying the Firm and Engaging in Outside Business Activities Without Prior Written Notice or Approval
Improperly Engaging in an Outside Business Activity and Creating Backdated Partnership Agreements
Providing False Information to a Member Firm Affiliate During an Internal Investigation
Structuring Cash Withdrawals to Circumvent the Federal Reporting Requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act
Impersonating Customers on Telephone Calls to an Insurance Company
Converting Member Firm Funds
Effecting Unauthorized Trades, Exercising Discretion Without Authorization, Failing to Disclose Customer Complaints, and Making Misrepresentations to the Firm
5. Providing False Information to a Member Firm Affiliate During an Internal Investigation [Sanctions: $10K fine, 6-Month Suspension]
FINRA settled a matter involving a Registered Representative (“RR”) who provided false information to an affiliate of his member firm during the course of an internal investigation concerning his claim that certain charges on his credit card were fraudulent. In August 2015, the RR contacted the issuer of one of his credit cards, which also was an affiliate of the RR's member firm. The RR claimed that several recent charges on his credit card were fraudulent because he had lost his wallet during the timeframe when the charges were incurred.
In October 2015, the RR spoke to the security division of the credit card issuer and claimed he had never been at the location where the charges had been incurred. But after the RR was informed the signatures on the credit card receipts at issue matched that of his bank signature card, the RR claimed someone must have forged his signature. The credit card initiated an internal investigation to determine the veracity of the RR's claims.
In November 2015, the RRr was interviewed as part of the investigation. During the interview, the RR abandoned his stolen-wallet and forgery claims, and now claimed that someone must have drugged him before the disputed charges were incurred because he did not have any memory of the 15-hour period when the charges were incurred.
The RR claimed that he could neither confirm nor deny that he made any of the disputed charges. The RR did not have any plausible basis for claiming that someone had drugged him. Moreover, the RR knew he had been at the location where the charges had been incurred, and that he had authorized the charges at issue. In December 2015, the RR's member firm and its banking affiliate terminated the RR after concluding that his initial fraud claim, and his subsequent alternative explanations during the internal investigation, were false. By making false statements during an internal investigation, the representative violated FINRA Rule 2010.
6. Structuring Cash Withdrawals to Circumvent the Federal Reporting Requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act [Sanctions: $10K fine, 2-Year Suspension]
FINRA settled a matter involving an RR who “structured” cash withdrawals from his personal bank account to avoid the federal reporting requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). Structuring occurs when an individual conducts, or attempts to conduct, one or more transactions in currency, in any amount, at one or more financial institutions, on one or more days, in any manner, for the purpose of evading the reporting requirements of the BSA. The phrase “in any manner” includes the breaking down of a single sum of currency exceeding $10,000 into smaller sums at or below $10,000, as well as conducting a series of currency transactions at or below $10,000.
Between January 2012 and May 2014, the RR made 23 cash withdrawals totaling $218,000 from his personal bank account in the amounts of $9,000 or $9,500. The RR intentionally made the 23 cash withdrawals in amounts less than $10,000 in an attempt to evade the banks’ federal reporting requirements under the BSA. The withdrawals did not involve customer funds nor were customers impacted in any way. By intentionally making cash withdrawals from his personal bank account in a manner designed to evade the bank’s BSA federal reporting requirements, the RR violated FINRA Rule 2010.
7. Impersonating Customers on Telephone Calls to an Insurance Company [Sanctions: $5K fine, 30-Day Suspension]
FINRA settled a matter involving an RR who impersonated 2 customers who held annuity contracts with an insurance company. On 4 occasions between July 2013 and July 2016, the RR telephoned an insurance company’s annuity service department and impersonated 2 customers who held equity-indexed annuities with the company. The RR's telephone calls were intended to obtain current information in preparation for customer meetings, obtain documents that would facilitate a mortgage refinance, and to update a contract holder’s address of record. By misrepresenting his identity to the insurance company, the RR violated FINRA Rule 2010 (ethical standards).
8. Converting Member Firm Funds [Sanctions: Barred from the Industry]
FINRA settled a matter involving an RR who converted his member firm’s funds for his own benefit. Between July and November 2015, the RR's member firm paid for employee parking at the RR's office location under certain circumstances. The member firm typically paid the parking expense by validating parking garage tickets using a parking stamp. When approved, a manager or other designated employee signed or initialed the back of the parking garage ticket.
During the relevant period, the RR, without authorization, validated his daily parking garage ticket on 50 separate days by stamping the parking garage ticket with the member firm’s parking stamp and forging a manager’s or other employee’s signature or initials on the back of the ticket. The total value of the falsely validated parking garage tickets was $731. By using the falsely validated parking garage tickets to pay for parking expenses to which he was not entitled, the RR converted $731 of his member firm’s funds for his own benefit. By converting his member firm’s funds for his personal use, the representative violated FINRA Rule 2010.
9. Effecting Unauthorized Trades, Exercising Discretion Without Authorization, Failing to Disclose Customer Complaints, and Making Misrepresentations to the Firm [Sanctions: 2-Year Suspension]
FINRA settled a matter involving an RR who made unauthorized trades in 6 customer accounts, exercised discretion without authorization in 2 customer accounts, failed to disclose 2 customer complaints to his member firm, and made misrepresentations to his member firm. Between February and April 2015, the RR effected 11 unauthorized trades, both sales and purchases of securities, in accounts belonging to 6 customers without the customers’ knowledge or consent. By executing the trades in customer accounts without the customers’ prior knowledge or consent, the representative violated FINRA Rule 2010.
In April and May 2015, respectively, the RR made 1 discretionary trade in the account of 1 customer, and made 3 discretionary trades in the account of a 2nd customer. Although the customers had verbally authorized the trades, the RR did not speak with either customer on the dates of the trades, and he did not speak to the customers before he entered the trade orders. By exercising discretion in customer accounts without obtaining the customers’ prior written authorization or his member firm’s written acceptance of the accounts as discretionary, the RR violated NASD Rule 2510(b) (discretionary accounts) and FINRA Rule 2010.
In February and April 2015, respectively, the RR failed to disclose 2 customer complaints to the member firm. The RR received a written complaint from 1 customer, which alleged that the RR had provided poor customer service to the customer. The RR also received a written complaint from a 2nd customer in April 2015. The 2nd customer complaint alleged that the RR had made unauthorized trades in the customer’s account. By failing to disclose the 2 customer complaints to the member firm, the RR prevented the member firm’s compliance with its reporting obligations under FINRA Rules 4513 and 4530.
When the RR received the above-referenced customer complaint from the customer who alleged that he had made unauthorized trades in the customer’s account, the RR submitted a trade correction request to the member firm. The trade correction request required that the RR provide a reason for the correction. The RR stated in writing that the customer had changed her mind about the trades, and that the customer needed access to the funds for a family emergency. The RR's representations were false. By making misrepresentations to his member firm on the trade correction request, the representative violated FINRA Rule 2010.