BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
FINRA Upticks Its Trade Reporting FAQs
Tape report: BD1 (as agent) reports a cross—no short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report #1: BD1 (as agent) buys from BD3—short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report #2: BD1 (as agent) sells to BD2—no short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator
Alternative #2Tape report: BD1 (as agent) buys from BD3—short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report: BD1 (as agent) sells to BD2—no short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator
Alternative #3Tape report: BD1 (as agent) sells to BD2—no short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report: BD1 (as agent) buys from BD3—short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator
Q407.6: Assume the same facts as FAQ 407.5. For purposes of this example, BD1 elects to report under Alternative #2 (i.e., the tape report shows BD1 and BD3 as the parties to the trade). BD1 fails to include the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator in the tape report. Can BD1 submit a non-tape report to show that BD3 was selling short (or short exempt)? New Graphic A407.6: No. If BD1 identifies BD3 in the tape report, but fails to include the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator in that report, BD1 must cancel and replace the original tape report with a new tape report that includes the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator. In such instance, BD1 would not be required to cancel an associated clearing-only report, assuming that BD1 submits a tape only cancellation and then re-reports the trade between BD1 and BD3, with the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator, as tape only. Q407.7: Assume the same facts as FAQ 407.5. For purposes of this example, BD1 elects to report under Alternative #3 (i.e., the non-tape report shows BD1 and BD3 as the parties to the trade). BD1 fails to include the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator in the non-tape report. Can BD1 submit a second non-tape report to show that BD3 was selling short (or short exempt)? New Graphic A407.7: No. If BD1 identifies BD3 in the non-tape report, but fails to include the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator in that report, BD1 must cancel and replace the original non-tape report with a new non-tape report that includes the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator. In such instance, BD1 would not be required to cancel the original tape report. Q407.8: Member BD1 matches as agent a buy order from member BD2 and an order to sell short (or short exempt) for the same quantity of shares at the same price from a customer (or non-member broker-dealer). How should this transaction be reported? New Graphic A407.8: BD1 is the executing party and has the trade reporting obligation. (See FAQ 308.1.) BD1 can report this transaction in one of 3 ways, and because the party that is selling short (or short exempt) is not a member, BD1 should include the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator in the tape report under all 3 alternatives: Alternative #1Tape report: BD1 (as agent) reports a cross—short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report: BD1 (as agent) sells to BD2—no short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator
Alternative #2Tape report: BD1 (as agent) sells to BD2—short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report: Not required
Alternative #3Tape report: BD1 (as agent) buys from customer (or non-member)—short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report: BD1 (as agent) sells to BD2—no short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator
Q407.9: Member BD1 matches as agent a buy order from a customer (or non-member broker-dealer) and an order to sell short (or short exempt) for the same quantity of shares at the same price from member BD2. How should this transaction be reported? New Graphic A407.9: BD1 is the executing party and has the trade reporting obligation. (See FAQ 308.1.) BD1 can report this transaction in one of three ways, and because the party selling short (or short exempt), BD2, is a FINRA member, BD1 should include the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator only in the report (tape or non-tape) that identifies BD2 as the seller: Alternative #1Tape report: BD1 (as agent) reports a cross—no short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report: BD1 (as agent) buys from BD2—short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator
Alternative #2Tape report: BD1 (as agent) buys from BD2—short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report: Not required
Alternative #3Tape report: BD1 (as agent) sells to customer or non-member—no short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator Non-tape report: BD1 (as agent) buys from BD2—short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator
Q407.10: Member BD1’s customer wants to sell 100 shares of ABCD, and BD1 will handle the customer’s order on a riskless principal basis. The customer is long the 100 shares of ABCD; however, BD1 does not have 100 shares of ABCD in its proprietary account. Is BD1 required to mark its sale to the street with the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator? New Graphic A407.10: Yes. Even though BD1’s customer is long the shares, since BD1 does not have the shares in its proprietary account, it must use the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator when routing the order to the street for execution. Accordingly, the trade report(s) showing the sale from BD1 to the street must include the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator. Q407.11: If the tape report of a trade contains the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator, should the non-tape report for that same trade also contain the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator? New Graphic A407.11: No. Firms should include the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator in only one report, i.e., the report that identifies the short (or short exempt) seller. If both the tape report and non-tape report identify the short (or short exempt) seller, then the short sale (or short sale exempt) indicator should be used in the tape report only. ============================================ Reporting Transactions for Regulatory Purposes Section 604: Odd Lot Transactions New Graphic Q604.1: What is an odd lot for purposes of the trade reporting rules? New Graphic A604.1: For purposes of the trade reporting rules, an odd lot is less than a "normal unit of trading," which is generally defined as “100 shares of a security unless, with respect to a particular security, FINRA determines that a normal unit of trading shall constitute other than 100 shares.” See, e.g., Rules 6320A and 6320B. Q604.2: How should odd lot transactions be reported to FINRA for regulatory transaction fee purposes? New Graphic A604.2: When reporting odd lot transactions to FINRA for regulatory transaction fee purposes, firms must mark the trade report for media dissemination (i.e., "for publication" or as "tape eligible"), and report to FINRA within 30 seconds of trade execution. See, e.g., FAQ 102.1. Q604.3: Are odd lot transactions disseminated? New Graphic A604.3: Although reports of odd lot transactions are marked "for publication" or as "tape eligible," with the general exception of certain high-priced securities, transactions of fewer than 100 shares are not publicly disseminated by FINRA or the appropriate securities information processor. See Trade Reporting Notice 3/18/08 (Revised Policy for Disseminating Reports of Fewer Than 100 Shares). For further details, go to: [FINRA - Trade Reporting FAQs, Last Update 3/9/12].
