Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 

 

 

 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

ABOUT FINANCIALISH

We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.

 

Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.

 

SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS

FOLLOW US

Archive

First New York Securities Fined

March 28, 2011

First New York Securities of New York, NY, agreed to a $65K fine and other sanctions to settle FINRA charges relating to firm's handling of electronic communications.  According to FINRA, First New York failed to preserve for a period of not less than 3 years, the first 2 in an accessible place, copies of IM's sent and received between several of the firm’s traders and an external party on certain days over the course of 10 weeks, as well as the new account form and clearing agreement for one of the firm’s accounts at another broker-dealer.

    Misrepresentation of Submitted Reports and Documents.   In response to an NASD Rule 8210 request for documentation evidencing past supervisory reviews of e-communications, the firm ended up submitting newly-created documentation that merely duplicated past reviews, but were not copies of actual past reviews.

The problem began when ... a firm principal orally asked the associated person originally responsible for the firm’ reviews of such e-communications to gather and deliver the evidence of such reviews.  When the associated person realized he had misplaced the file, he apparently was directed by his supervisor to duplicate past reviews. 

The problem escalated when ..., instead of duplicating such reviews using the same parameters as were in effect during the review period, the associated person re-conducted such reviews using changed and expanded parameters, signed and hand-wrote in dates of when he estimated the reviews took place, and delivered them to the secretary of the firm principal who was responding to the inquiry on the firm’s behalf. 

The problem came to a head when ... the firm submitted the assembled documents to FINRA without allegedly first subjecting them to a supervisory review.  Rather than being evidence of of past reviews, the firm submitted newly-created reports that were neither authentic nor contemporaneous evidence of supervisory reviews that were actually conducted during the review period. 

    Additional Sanctions.   In addition to the fine, the firm must revise its WSP's concerning retention and review of e-communications.  The sanctions reflected certain mitigating factors.  This is FINRA Case #2006005271003.   [FINRA March Disciplinary Actions]