Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 

 

 

 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

ABOUT FINANCIALISH

We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.

 

Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.

 

SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS

FOLLOW US

Archive

Guggenheim Securities Fined, CDO Traders Suspended

October 11, 2012

[ by Larry Goldfarb]

Question:  Does anyone here know how to supervise CDO traders?

Guggenheim Securities, LLC was fined $800,000 for failing to supervise two collateralized debt obligation (CDO) traders who engaged in activities to hide a trading loss. Alexander Rekeda, the former head of Guggenheim's CDO Desk, and Timothy Day, a trader on Guggenheim's CDO Desk, were punished with fines and suspensions: one year, $50,000 and four months, $20,000 respectively.

Brad Bennett, FINRA's Vice President and Chief of Enforcement, said, "Guggenheim's inadequate supervision allowed their traders to engage in extensive and repeated inappropriate actions to try to conceal a trading loss. The traders deceived their customer and supported their scheme through the use of inaccurate books and records, all of which went undetected by the firm."

In October 2008, as the result of a failed trade, Guggenheim's CDO Desk acquired a €5,000,000 junk-rated tranche of a collateralized loan obligation (CLO).

  • After unsuccessful attempts by Guggenheim's CDO Desk to sell the position, Rekeda and Day persuaded a hedge fund customer to purchase the CLO for $950,000 more than it had previously agreed to pay by falsely presenting the CLO as part of a package of securities a third party offered for sale.
  • In an attempt to hide the trading loss on the CLO position, the traders allegedly provided the customer with order tickets that increased the price for the CLO position and decreased the price of the other positions that were part of the transaction.
  • When the customer inquired about the pricing adjustments, Day, at Rekeda's direction, lied and said a 3rd-party seller of the CLO position had already settled the trade at a higher price and requested the customer pay this higher price.
  • The customer agreed to overpay for the CLO and in return, Day and Rekeda agreed to compensate the customer through other transactions, including pricing adjustments on 6 other CLO trades, a waiver of fees the customer owed in connection with resecuritization transactions, and a cash payment to the customer. The records created to document the transactions did not indicate any connection to the overpayment for the CLO.
  • Guggenheim further allegedly failed to conduct adequate review of the CDO Desk's trades, documentation concerning transactions by traders on the desk, and the traders' email communications.


For further details, go to:  [FINRA News Release, 10/12/12].