BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- Wells Fargo Has Shown Us Its Contemptible Values
- UBS to Counter Trading Troubles With M&A Work
- SEC Moves Quickly To Shut Down Fake Pre-IPO Share Scam
- SEC Testimony: Oversight of the SEC Division of Enforcement
- FINRA Modifies 'Agency Debt Security' in Rule 6710
- Is Jamie Dimon Doing a U-Turn on Bitcoin?
- After New Yorker's Racist Rant Goes Viral, His Law Firm Gets Pummeled with 1-Star Yelp Reviews
- Bill O’Donnell is New CFO at MetLife
- Trump Still Owes Deutsche Bank, Others as Much as $480Mn
- Wells Fargo Scandals Hurt Its Retirement Business
- Michigan State to Pay $500Mn to Victims of Larry Nassar's Abuse
- Top Lawyer at Novartis Leaving Over $1.2Mn Contract with Michael Cohen's Consulting Firm
- Cadwalader Adds Mark Chorazak to its Financial Regulation Practice
- Deutsche Bank: It's A Short According to Eisman of ‘The Big Short’ Fame
- Up In Smoke: Bank of Montreal Goes All-In on Pot Deals
- RBS to Pay $4.9Bn to Settle Toxic MBS Probe with U.S.
- Apple and Goldman Sachs Team Up to Release New Credit Card
- Robinhood, A Stock, Trading App Rejected by 75 Investors, Now Worth $5.6Bn
- Wells Fargo Reportedly Pocketed Fire And Police Department Pension Fund Fee Rebates
- Trading App Robinhood Surpasses E*Trade In User Numbers
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Inconsistent Ticket Charges Leads to Broker-Dealer Fine
First Dallas Securities, a Dallas-based broker-dealer and FINRA member since 1989, agreed to pay a $87K in fines and restitution to settle FINRA charges that it improperly charged ticket charges in at least 449 transactions involving 129 accounts for clients of Hodges Capital Management, its affiliated RIA.
BACKGROUND. First Dallas conducts a general securities business and currently has approximately 24 registered reps (‘RRs’) and one branch office.
ACCORDING TO FINRA. Trades on behalf of HCM clients are placed through the firm’s trade processing platform, which incurs transaction and handling fees that are assessed by the firm’s clearing firm. Some or all of these fees are passed on by the firm to the RIA’s clients in the form of a ticket charge. Because the firm permits its RRs - who are all dually registered with the RIA - to determine the amount of the ticket charge (if any) that will be assessed to their clients, these charges are not uniform.
Indeed, the firm’s RRs utilized at least 12 different ticket charge structures in connection with trade processing, including varying flat fees, per-share fees and hybrid fees. These fees were disclosed in the customers’ advisory agreements with the RIA. For most of 2010 through 2014, the Firm improperly charged ticket charges in at least 449 transactions involving 129 accounts for HCM clients, with the total amount of overcharged ticket charges being $42,530 - which the firm voluntarily repaid to affected customers. These improper charges also were assessed in connection with the processing of block trades, which generally resulted in the assessment of a higher processing fee for brokerage transactions.
FINRA attributes the violative actions to the firm’s failure to properly supervise its RRs so that each customer was charged only the fee that was disclosed in those customer's respective advisory agreements.
This case was reported in FINRA Disciplinary Actions for May 2017.
For details on this case, go to ... FINRA Disciplinary Actions Online, and refer to Case #2014039095801.