BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- State Street Challenging BNY Mellon As Largest Custody Bank
- Changes to FINRA Advisory Committees: Phase 1
- SEC Approves CAT Fee Dispute Resolution Process
- Boston-Area Consultant & Friend Settle SEC Insider Trading Charges
- SEC Chair Clayton: Statement on Status of the Consolidated Audit Trail ('CAT')
- Goldman to Launch $5bn Fund with China Investment Corp.
- Wells Fargo Launches Robo-Adviser Targeting Millenial Investors
- Barclays Fails to End U.S. 'Dark Pool' Class Action
- Goldman Sachs' Chief Risk Officer, Craig Broderick, to Retire
- Time to Renew FINRA Registrations - B/D, IA, Agent, IA Rep, Branches
- New Jersey’s Next Governor Could Be a Democrat Who Worked at Goldman Sachs
- FINRA New York Region Networking Seminar - December 1st
- SEC Approves “Pay-to-Play” and Related Rules for Capital Acquisition Brokers
- Hedge Fund Giant Paul Singer Targeted for Destruction by Steve Bannon
- Saudi Arabia's arrest of Prince Alwaleed 'would be like arresting Warren Buffett or Bill Gates' in the US
- Arrest of Billionaire Saudi Prince Touches Sizable Stakes - Citigroup, Twitter, Lyft
- New York Fed President William Dudley set to announce retirement
- FINRA Arbitration Panel Rules Against ex-LPL Broker in $30Mn Lawsuit vs. Firm
- OOPS! Goldman, JPMorgan, BofA Fail in Pricing an IPO
- Former Merrill Broker Pleads Guilty to Fee Fraud, Faces Up To 25 Years
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
JPMorgan Cleared in Madoff Lawsuit
A federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday that JPMorgan is not liable to a group of former clients of Bernie Madoff who blamed the bank for taking an active role in his Ponzi scheme while ignoring subsequent red flags from the scandal.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan upheld the earlier ruling by federal judge John Koeltl who, in 2016, ruled that JPMorgan was, at most, negligent in its dealings with Madoff.
The suit was brought against JPMorgan by about 2,500 so-called "net winners" who withdrew more money from their accounts at Bernie Madoff & Co. - aka Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC - than they invested. These investors felt that their claims were undervalued in the liquidation of Madoff’s firm.
FINANCIALISH COMMENTS. Time has not changed our opinion that JPMorgan was grossly negligent in its relationship with master Ponzi schemer, Bernie Madoff. Yes, some years back JPMorgan anted up $2.4 billion to settle litigation related to Madoff and, yes, the bank acknowledged its responsibility for failing to stop Madoff in a settlement with the federal government.
That said, JPMorgan’s ‘do nothing, say nothing’ approach to Bernie Madoff has never been fully explained – or, for that matter, fully investigated (to our satisfaction – although, who are we in this matter). After all, how could a custodian that presumably held billions of dollars for an investment advisor or a broker-dealer not investigate suspicious activities – or in this case, suspicious INACTIVITIES. Once red flags were noted, it seems probable that the bank would have some basis for concern, which it probably would have shared with regulators.
Unfortunately, little, if any, light has been shed on JPMorgan’s handling of Madoff’s billions. Of course, why would a banker wish to “upset the apple cart’, when such a relationship brings in hundreds of millions in fees and other revenue to the bank? [See Financialish, 3/4/11]
And so, with today’s ruling, another chapter in this sordid financial scandal ends. RIP.