BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- North Korean caught secretly mining bitcoin rival
- IPO Timelines Cut by 80% After SEC's Private Filing Decision
- How the Carried Interest Break Survived the Tax Bill
- FINRA: The Neutral Corner
- Coinbasex Says Buying and Selling Temporarily Disabled Amid Price Rout
- Bitcoin plunges by more than a third in a single day
- Goldman Is Setting Up a Cryptocurrency Trading Desk
- Jefferies Lets Employees Choose When to Receive Their Bonuses
- UBS Told to Pay $903K After Losing Retaliation Verdict
- BEWARE: Long Island Iced Tea Shares Soar After Changing Name to Long Blockchain
- Gary Cohn’s Last Laugh: Cashing Out on Trump’s Tax Plan
- E*Trade Lets Customers Trade in CBOE Bitcoin Futures
- Swiss Find Serious Shortcomings at JPMorgan in 1MDB Case
- Washington-based Investment Adviser and His Business Partner Charged in Multi-Million Dollar Scheme
- FINRA Board of Governors Meeting
- Cryptocurrency Market Now Doing Same Daily Volume as the NYSE
- Jailed Barclays Trader Must Pay $400,000 From Libor Profits
- Trump Asks ‘How’s Your 401(k)?’ But Most Voters Don’t Have One
- A Bitcoin Hedge Fund’s Return: 25,004% (That Wasn’t a Typo)
- Madoff Victims Near Full Recovery of Principal With Payout
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
JPMorgan Cleared in Madoff Lawsuit
A federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday that JPMorgan is not liable to a group of former clients of Bernie Madoff who blamed the bank for taking an active role in his Ponzi scheme while ignoring subsequent red flags from the scandal.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan upheld the earlier ruling by federal judge John Koeltl who, in 2016, ruled that JPMorgan was, at most, negligent in its dealings with Madoff.
The suit was brought against JPMorgan by about 2,500 so-called "net winners" who withdrew more money from their accounts at Bernie Madoff & Co. - aka Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC - than they invested. These investors felt that their claims were undervalued in the liquidation of Madoff’s firm.
FINANCIALISH COMMENTS. Time has not changed our opinion that JPMorgan was grossly negligent in its relationship with master Ponzi schemer, Bernie Madoff. Yes, some years back JPMorgan anted up $2.4 billion to settle litigation related to Madoff and, yes, the bank acknowledged its responsibility for failing to stop Madoff in a settlement with the federal government.
That said, JPMorgan’s ‘do nothing, say nothing’ approach to Bernie Madoff has never been fully explained – or, for that matter, fully investigated (to our satisfaction – although, who are we in this matter). After all, how could a custodian that presumably held billions of dollars for an investment advisor or a broker-dealer not investigate suspicious activities – or in this case, suspicious INACTIVITIES. Once red flags were noted, it seems probable that the bank would have some basis for concern, which it probably would have shared with regulators.
Unfortunately, little, if any, light has been shed on JPMorgan’s handling of Madoff’s billions. Of course, why would a banker wish to “upset the apple cart’, when such a relationship brings in hundreds of millions in fees and other revenue to the bank? [See Financialish, 3/4/11]
And so, with today’s ruling, another chapter in this sordid financial scandal ends. RIP.