BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Madoff-Mets Inseparable Link
Today's BTN story that owners of the New York Mets baseball team have identified preferred bidders for a minority (25%) stake in the team, may help resolve one large, and highly publicized, Madoff lawsuit against a former Madoff investor, according to lawyer James Rothenberg. Here's Mr. Rothenberg's theory:
"The sale of a 25% minority interest in the Mets for an amount that pays the Madoff trustee 300 million after capital gains taxes, federal and state, should lead to a settlement."
Behind The Theory. Madoff trustee Irving Picard has sued NYMets owners Fred Wilpon and Saul Katz, et al, $1 billion, charging them with enabling the Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme by continuing to invest with Mr. Madoff in the face of numerous “red flags” that should have led them to avoid him, which harmed the other investors who continued to invest when the fraud was allowed to continue unabated - i.e., the pair (Mr. Wilpon and Mr. Katz) looked the other way while they benefited from Madoff money.
Even though Mr. Wilpon and Mr. Katz were themselves deceived by Mr. Madoff, the lawsuit seeks to hold them responsible for the indirect benefits they derived from the apparent success of their many investments in Mr. Madoff’s firm, which allowed them to flourish in other areas, including buying the Mets. Mr. Picard calculated those gains at about $700 million, beyond the $300 million in fictitious profits that he contends the two men collected over the years that he also wants to recover.
Mr. Picard goes into great detail to show that the defendants received numerous warnings that Mr. Madoff’s investment program could not generate the returns it was reporting, yet they continued to invest with him. The gist of the claim against Mr. Wilpon and Mr. Katz is that although they “knew that Madoff’s returns were almost statistically impossible and sharply at odds with his split-strike conversion strategy, they willfully disregarded any criticisms of Madoff and simply buried their heads in the sand.”
Conclusion. In the end, as Mr. Rothenberg surmises, Irving Picard is likely to accept the $300 million as a "clawback" of fictitious profits in exchange for dropping the $700 million claim. Sounds logical.
For a more details on the $1 billion lawsuit, go to: [NYT Dealbook, 2/7/11, "Mets Owners Face Novel Claim in Madoff Clawback"]

