BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
MSRB Plans to Revise Telemarketing Rule G-39
[ by Howard Haykin ]
The MSRB proposes to amend Rule G-39 governing telemarketing, by adding provisions substantially similar to FTC rules that prohibit deceptive and other abusive telemarketing acts or practices. Currently, Rule G-39 requires brokers, dealers, and municipal securities dealers (“dealers”) to, among other things, (i) maintain do-not-call lists, and (ii) limit the hours of telephone solicitations.
In 1996, the SEC directed the MSRB to enact a telemarketing rule in accordance with the Prevention Act. The Prevention Act requires the Commission to promulgate, or direct any national securities exchange or registered securities association to promulgate, rules substantially similar to the FTC rules to prohibit deceptive and other abusive telemarketing acts or practices, unless the Commission determines either that the rules are not necessary or appropriate for the protection of investors or the maintenance of fair and orderly markets, or that existing federal securities laws or Commission rules already provide for such protection.
In 1997, the SEC determined that telemarketing rules promulgated and expected to be promulgated by SROs, together with the other rules of the SROs, the federal securities laws, and the SEC’s rules thereunder, satisfied the requirements of the Prevention Act because, at the time, the applicable provisions of those laws and rules were substantially similar to the Telemarketing Sales Rule.
Since then, the FTC has amended its telemarketing rules in light of changing telemarketing practices and technology. However, concerned that SROs had not kept pace with FTC changes, Commission staff directed the MSRB to conduct a review of its telemarketing rule and update its rule protections so that they are at least as strong as those provided by the FTC’s telemarketing rules.
What MSRB Is Proposing. The proposed rule amendments, as directed by the Commission staff, amend and adopt provisions in Rule G-39 that:
-
adopts a provision in Rule G-39(a)(iv) reminding dealers that engage in telemarketing that they also are subject to requirements of relevant state and federal laws and - including the Prevention Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and the rules of the FCC relating to telemarketing practices, and the rights of telephone consumers. [General Telemarketing Requirements]
-
deletes from Rule G-39(d)(vi) the requirement that a dealer honor a firm-specific do-not-call request for 5 years from the time the request is made, and in order to make that requirement a permanent one - indefinitely. It also clarifies the rule to reflect that the record of do-not-call requests must be permanent. [Maintenance of Do-Not-Call Lists]
-
retains the provision in Rule G-39(f) that dealers, when using another entity to perform telemarketing services on its behalf, the dealer remains responsible for ensuring compliance with all provisions contained in the rule. Further proposed that dealers must consider whether the entity or person handling the outsource task is properly registered or licensed, where required. [Outsourcing Telemarketing]
-
retains the provision in Rule 39(h) that requires the caller to transmit caller ID information, and is explicitly prohibited from blocking such information. [Caller Identification Information].
The proposed rule amendments addresses other provisions, including: (i) Submission of Billing Information; (ii) Abandoned Calls; (ii) Prerecorded Messages; (iv) Credit Card Laundering. For the complete text of the rule filing, click on the hyperlink below.
For further details,, go to: [ MSRB Rule Filing 13-2, 2/11/13 ].

