BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
NY-Based Adviser: Allegedly Violated Rule 105 of Reg. M
In connection with an offering of equity securities for cash pursuant to a registration statement. . . filed under the Securities Act of 1933 ("offered securities"), it shall be unlawful for any person to sell short . . . the security that is the subject of the offering and purchase the offered securities from an underwriter or broker or dealer participating in the offering if such short sale was effected during the period ("Rule 105 restricted period") that is the shorter of the period: (1) Beginning 5 business days before the pricing of the offered securities; or (2) Beginning with the initial filing of such registration statement . . . and ending with the pricing. 17 C.F.R. § 242.105(a)(1) and (a)(2) (effective October 9, 2007).
On Thursday, 4/9/09, and on Wednesday, 4/15/09, 5 of the funds advised by Wesley sold short a total of 460,000 shares of Duke stock at prices ranging from $7.59 to $8.22 per share. On Wednesday, April 15, 2009, Duke stock closed at $8.44. On Thursday, April 16, 2009, before the trading markets opened, Duke priced a follow-on offering of its stock at $7.65 per share. The registered shares were offered to the public through a group of underwriters on a firm-commitment basis. Accordingly, the Rule 105 restricted period ran from Thursday, April 9, 2009 through Wednesday, April 15, 2009. On Thursday, April 16, 2009, the same 5 funds advised by Wesley that had sold Duke short, purchased 225,000 shares in the follow-on offering at $7.65 per share. Wesley therefore realized an unlawful profit of $82,027 by participating in the Duke offering after having shorted Duke stock during the Rule 105 restricted period. On Thursday, April 23, 2009, 5 of the funds advised by Wesley sold short a total of 950,000 shares of Host stock at prices ranging from $6.98 to $7.55 per share. On Thursday, April 23, 2009, Host stock closed at $7.10 per share. On Friday, April 24, 2009, before the trading markets opened, Host priced a follow-on offering of its stock at $6.60 per share. The registered shares were offered to the public through a group of underwriters on a firm-commitment basis. Accordingly, the Rule 105 restricted period ran from Friday, April 17, 2009, through Thursday, April 23, 2009. On Friday, April 24, 2009, the same five funds advised by Wesley that had sold Host short, purchased 125,000 shares in the follow-on offering at $6.60 per share. Wesley therefore realized an unlawful profit of $60,097 by participating in the Host offering after having shorted Host stock during the Rule 105 period. After the conduct described above, Wesley developed and implemented policies and procedures pertaining to compliance with Rule 105 of Regulation M. Violations and Sanctions. As a result of the conduct described above, Wesley willfully committed violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M. For these violations, Wesley agrees to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M of the Exchange Act. Wesley shall within 20 days of this Order, pay disgorgement of $142,124, prejudgment interest of $15,165, and a civil penalty of $75,000. For further details, go to: [SEC Admin Proceeding 3-14962, 7/26/12].
