BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
RBC Capital Markets Fined: Lacked Basic Tools for Supervising Closed-End Fund Transactions
(ii) In August 2010, RBC settled NYSE-Reg charges that it failed to implement adequate controls, including a reasonable system of followup and review designed to detect and prevent potentially violative wash trading activity on the ARCA marketplace.
(iii) From June 2007 through January 2010, NYSE-Reg or FINRA applied another 4 disciplinary actions against RBC – which we note but do not provide identifying information.
FINRA Findings and Allegations. Starting around March 2005 and continuing through at least August 2010 – a 5-1/2 year period – RBC allegedly failed to establish and maintain a supervisory system and establish, maintain and enforce WSPs reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable rules and regulations concerning short-term transactions in closed end funds ("CEFs"). The firm's alleged supervisory deficiencies caused the failure of RBC supervisory to prevent unsuitable CEF transactions recommended by one of its RRs.For CEFs purchased at the IPO, the sales charges to the customer are built into the offering price. The NAV of the underlying securities portfolio is below the public offering price. Therefore, the market price for CEFs often declines after trading begins in the secondary market. Consequently, CEFs purchased at the IPO are generally considered long-term investments and unsuitable vehicles for short-term trading.
During the relevant time period, RBC underwrote IPOs involving CEFs. Yet, the firm failed to employ adequate internal controls and supervisory procedures to identify and deal with patterns of unsuitable short-term trading of CEFs, including those purchased at the IPO.- e.g. - RBC's WSPs failed to address the suitability of recommendations involving CEFs, and further did not provide guidance to supervisors about potential abuses relating to short-term trading sales of CEFs purchased at the IPO.
- e.g. - RBC did not utilize any exception reports or other processes to detect short-term trading of CEFs. The sole means available to firm supervisors to identify such trading was through the daily review of trade blotters - yet, given the hundreds of potential transactions supervisors were required to review daily, this was an ineffective system.
- e.g. - RBC's trade blotters didn't identify when the CEFs had been purchased or if they had been acquired at the IPO - so, firm supervisors lacked an effective way to determine how long a customer held a CEF before the sale. As a result of the firm’s supervisory deficiencies, the firm failed to timely detect and prevent the FFs registered representative’s unsuitable short-term trading of CEFs.
The firm also filed an inaccurate Form U5 for the broker, specifically in reference to a disclosure question about internal reviews. RBC reported that the broker was not under internal review at the time of his termination when, in fact, he had been under such review. By filing an inaccurate Form U5, RBC violated FINRA Rules 1122 and 2010 FINRA Sanctions. RBC agreed to pay a $200K fine and $70K in partial restitution to a customer. For further details, go to: [FINRA AWC #2010022094901] and [FINRA Disc. Actions for July 2012].
