BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Santander Fined: Structured Product Business Deficiencies
Santander Securities Corporation of Puerto Rico agreed to pay a $2 million fine to settle FINRA charges it had deficiencies in its structured product business that included unsuitable sales and inadequate supervision. Additionally, the firm must review its training, supervision and WSP's in the relevant areas. Santander also had provided more than $7mn in restitution to its customers for losses that resulted from reverse convertible securities.
FINRA specifically referred to these deficiencies:
- unsuitable sales of reverse convertible securities to retail customers;
- inadequate supervision of sales of structured products;
- inadequate supervision of accounts funded with loans from its affiliated bank;
- other violations re: the offering and sale of structured
'Structured Products' Defined. They're securities derived from or based on a single security, a group of securities, an index, a commodity, a debt issuance and/or foreign currency. Structured products may differ on principal protection offered, interest or coupon rates paid, and frequently cap or limit the upside participation in the underlying asset. Reverse convertibles, a type of structured product, are interest bearing notes in which principal repayment is linked to the performance of a reference asset - often a stock, a basket of stock or an index.
FINRA Allegations. Despite Santander Securities' growing sales in structured products, between September 2007 and September 2008, the firm failed to provide its brokers with the necessary tools - i.e., guidance and training - that would have enabled them to adequately evaluate the products they were selling. In addition, the firm ...
- had no process in place for reviewing or approving any particular structured product prior to offering the product to a customer.
- did not have effective procedures for monitoring customer accounts for potentially unsuitable purchases of structured products.
- had no suitability policies governing product concentration and, as a result, it failed to detect certain accounts with concentrated positions in certain risky structured products, specifically reverse convertibles.
Examples of an Unsuitable Recommendation and Sale. (i) In November 2007, Santander recommended that a retired couple in their 80s, with a moderate risk tolerance and a long-term growth objective, invest over $100,000 in a single reverse convertible position - representing 85% of their account value and over 50% of their liquid net worth. The couple ultimately incurred losses of over $88K. (ii) In November 2007, Santander recommended that an investor, 36, with no investment experience, moderate risk tolerance and a long-term growth objective, invest $95,000 in a single reverse convertible position - representing most of the account value. The resultant loss approximated $80,000.
"Adding insult to injury," some Santander Securities brokers recommended that customers use funds borrowed from the firm's banking affiliate to purchase reverse convertibles, claiming that it would enable the customers to capture the spread between the interest they paid to the bank and the higher coupon rate they received from the reverse convertible. The added leverage, however, substantially increased their exposures to risk - so many not only lost money, but owed additional money to the bank when the value of the reverse convertible declined and the bank sold the product at a loss. Here, too, Santander failed to adequately supervise and monitor customers' accounts pledged as collateral for these loans.
FINRA Enforcement Staff Credits. Investigated by Samantha Joseph, Kathryn Wilson, Julie Glynn, and supervised by Director Linda Walters, Regional Chief Counsel David Jaffe.
For additional information, go to: [FINRA News Release, 4/12] and [Santander Securities's AWC, 4/12/11]

