BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Features/Scandals
- Companies
- Technology/Internet
- Rules & Regulations
- Crimes
- Investments
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Hirings/Transitions
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Regulators
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Lawsuits/Arbitrations
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
- People
TRENDING TAGS
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
ABOUT FINANCIALISH
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
SEC Shielded from Madoff Investors Lawsuit
Appeals Court Denies Lawsuit Pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act.
[ by Howard Haykin ]
Investors who claim to have lost money in Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme may not pursue a lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for having messed up and missed Bernie's swindle. That decision was handed down by a federal appeals court on Monday - the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Pasadena, CA - which agreed with a federal district judge who dismissed their lawsuit seeking to hold the SEC responsible under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Monday's order upheld an April 2010 ruling by U.S. District Judge Stephen Wilson in Los Angeles. In April 2011, a Manhattan federal judge dismissed a similar lawsuit by 2 other Madoff investors.
Citing a 2009 report by the SEC Inspector General ... investors led by Dichter-Mad Family Partners LLP in Florida said they would not have invested with Madoff had the regulator availed itself of "multiple opportunities" to stop the fraud. Instead, they relied on the SEC's "implied stamp of approval" prior to investing, and for that reason they now sought to recover losses they attributed to SEC negligence.
The exhaustive August 2009 report issued by SEC Inspector General H. David Kotz outlined how the regulator failed to uncover Madoff's fraud by missing many red flags, disregarding tips, and failing to follow up properly on leads.
The SEC's "discretionary functions" ... served as the basis for the unsigned order by the 9th Circuit - i.e., the plaintiffs' claims fell within the regulator's "discretionary functions," depriving courts of jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
Responses to the Order. Richard Gordon, a lawyer who is one of the plaintiffs, said: "I respectfully disagree with the decision, and intend to seek further appellate review." SEC spokesman John Nester said in an email: "The decision speaks for itself."
The case is Dichter-Mad Family Partners LLP et al v. U.S., 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 11-55577.
For further details, go to: [ Reuters, 1/28/13 ].

