Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 

 

 

 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

ABOUT FINANCIALISH

We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.

 

Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.

 

SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS

FOLLOW US

Archive

Silicon Valley Man Can No Longer Tout the "Next Google"

April 10, 2012
[ by Melanie Gretchen ] The SEC charged a Silicon Valley man with fraudulently representing plans to take his company public, raising millions in investments for 2 Internet start-ups.  While he promised investors they would reap millions when the companies went public within a matter of months, he had no plans to take the companies public and kept the scheme afloat on investor funds, that is until he ran out of money by the end of 2008 - at which point he shut down the operation. SEC Findings and Allegations. Benedict Van of San Jose, CA, raised more than $6.2 million from investors for hereUare in 2007 and 2008, and $880,000 in investor funds for eCity in 2008, according to the SEC’s complaint, filed in federal court in the Northern District of California. "Van played on the hopes of investors, tricking them into believing that his companies were on the verge of becoming the next Silicon Valley success stories.  Investors should be wary of pitches promising IPO riches from companies with minimal operations and track records." -- Marc Fagel, Director of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office The Pitch. Van would meet with prospective investors mostly in homes in Sacramento and Stockton, where he presented himself out as a wealthy venture capitalist with prior IPO experience.  He told prospective investors that the companies had lucrative deals and patents, and that he had retained Goldman Sachs and an international law firm to help take the companies public within 6 months.  According to the SEC, all of these representations were false. Settlement. Van and hereUare violated the antifraud and registration provisions of U.S. securities laws, and eCity violated the antifraud provisions.  All three respondents consented to permanent injunctions.  Van  consented to being permanently barred from serving as a public company officer or director;  hereUare consented to an administrative proceeding order deregistering its stock with the Commission.  Financial penalties and restitution to investors were waived based on Van's demonstrated inability to pay. Jennifer J. Lee and Jina L. Choi of the San Francisco Regional Office conducted the SEC’s investigation. For further information, go to [SEC, 4/9/12] and the [SEC Complaint].
 

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

http://sec.gov/news/press/2012/2012-57.htm

 

SEC Settles Fraud Charges Against Silicon Valley Man

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

2012-57

 

Washington, D.C., April 9, 2012 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a Silicon Valley man who raised millions for two Internet start-ups by falsely promising investors that his companies were on the verge of undergoing successful initial public offerings and were well on their way to becoming the “next Google.”

 

Additional Materials

SEC Complaint

http://sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2012/comp22323.pdf

 

The SEC alleges that Benedict Van, of San Jose, Calif., lured investors into web-based start-ups hereUare, Inc. and eCity, Inc. by falsely telling them that the companies would go public within a matter of months and generate millions in quick returns. In truth, Van had no plans to take the companies public and relied solely on investor funds to stay in business. Ultimately, when investor funds ran out by the end of 2008, Van was forced to shut down operations.

 

“Van played on the hopes of investors, tricking them into believing that his companies were on the verge of becoming the next Silicon Valley success stories,” said Marc Fagel, Director of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office. “Investors should be wary of pitches promising IPO riches from companies with minimal operations and track records.”

 

According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in federal court in the Northern District of California, Van raised more than $6.2 million from investors for hereUare in 2007 and 2008, and raised $880,000 in investor funds for eCity in 2008. In presentations to prospective investors, chiefly in homes in Sacramento and Stockton, Van held himself out as a wealthy venture capitalist with prior IPO experience. Van told prospective investors that the companies had lucrative deals and patents, and that he had retained Goldman Sachs and an international law firm to help take the companies public within six months. According to the SEC, all of these representations were false.

 

The SEC’s complaint charges Van and hereUare violated the antifraud and registration provisions of U.S. securities laws, and charges eCity with violations of the antifraud provisions. Van, hereUare, and eCity have agreed to settle the charges against them without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations and have consented to permanent injunctions. Van also consented to a district court order to permanently bar him from serving as a public company officer or director, and hereUare has consented to an administrative proceeding order deregistering its stock with the Commission. The SEC waived any financial payment against Van based on his demonstrated inability to pay.

 

Jennifer J. Lee and Jina L. Choi of the San Francisco Regional Office conducted the SEC’s investigation.