BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- New Cyberattack Goes Global, Hits WPP, Rosneft, Maersk
- Deutsche Bank Said to Lose as Much as $60Mn Over Derivative Trade
- Dimon Says JPMorgan Headcount to Keep Rising Despite Automation
- RBS to Cut 443 Jobs In UK, Move Many of Them to India
- Deutsche Bank Bullish on London Despite Brexit
- Supreme Court Nears Finish With Big Cases, Retirement Rumors
- The Richest Person in Every State
- LPL Tabs Scott Seese, Former eBay Exec, as Chief Information Officer
- Fired Biglaw Associate Arrested for Trying to Extort Partners
- Canada's CIBC Completes $5Bn PrivateBancorp Buy
- Word ‘Women’ Literally Never Appears in U.S. Senate’s 142-Page Health-Care Bill
- Stephen Pierce, Goldman Sachs Global Head of Equity Markets, To Retire
- Al Gore 'Not Very Smart,’ But Became Filthy Rich Using Simple Investing Formula - Charlie Munger
- U.S. Regulators, Lawmakers Support Volcker Rule Revamp at Hearing
- Morgan Stanley Opts for Frankfurt as New EU Hub
- A New Risk for Goldman, Morgan Stanley in Stress Tests (subsc reqd)
- A Trump Bump for Law Firm of President’s Lawyer - Kasowitz Benson Torres
- JPMorgan, BofA, Goldman, Citi, Wells Fargo Pass Fed's Stress Test
- Blackstone Stock Still Trading at $31 - Its IPO Price From 10 Years Ago
- NJ Resident and NY-Based Global FX Club Charged with Solicitation Fraud, Misappropriation - CFTC
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Supreme Court Disgorges SEC
by Howard Haykin
The Supreme Court dealt a body blow to the SEC’s enforcement powers. In a unanimous 9-0 ruling (!!) on Monday, the High Court ruled that the Agency’s recovery method - disgorgement – is subject to a 5-year statute of limitations. Back in 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that civil monetary penalties are subject to a 5-year time bar.
The court decision was issued in the SEC’s case against former RIA Charles Kokesh.
KOKESH V. SEC. In 2009, the SEC filed suit against Charles Kokesh, a New Mexico investment adviser, on charges he misappropriated funds from 4 companies. A jury convicted Kokesh in 2014, and the federal judge ordered him to pay $55.4 million – including $34.9 million in disgorgement.
Kokesh appealed the decision, arguing that disgorgement for activities that occurred between 1995 and 2006 should be subject to the same 5-year statute of limitations that applies to civil fines, penalties or forfeitures under Section 2462 of the U.S. code. If such a limitation was applied, disgorgement in this case would only amount to about $5 million – not $34.9 million.
The SEC countered that disgorgement, which targets the "ill-gotten gain" reaped through a securities-law infraction, does not fall under the 5-year statute of limitations because it is "remedial" rather than "punitive." [See Financialish.com, 4/18/17]
SUPREME COURT OPINION. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who wrote the opinion for the Court, said that the SEC disgorgement process "bears all the hallmarks of penalty: It is imposed as a consequence of violating a public law and is intended to deter, not to compensate." On that basis, the amount of disgorgement must be bound by the 5-year statute of limitations that already applies to "any civil fine, penalty or forfeiture."
[Click here for Supreme Court Opinion.]