BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- SEC Adopts Statement and Interpretive Guidance on Public Company Cybersecurity Disclosures
- SEC Charges Former Bitcoin Exchange and Its Founder With Fraud
- JPMorgan Chase to Replace NYC Headquarters with 70-Story Skyscraper
- Citigroup Raises CEO Corbat's Pay 48% to $23Mn
- Should Congress Create a Crypto-Cop?
- JPMorgan Weighs Buying an Exchange-Traded Funds Firm
- Hey, Goldman Sachs: Wanna Buy BNY Mellon?
- SEC Order Rejecting Acquisition of Chicago Stock Exchange (CSX) by Chinese-Baesd Company
- Kyle Moffatt Named Chief Accountant in SEC CorpFinance
- SEC Suspends Trading in 3 Issuers Claiming Involvement in Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technology
- Karen Garnett, Assoc. Director of SEC CorpFinance, to Leave After 23 Years of Service
- Louisiana Adviser Barred for Hiding Losses from Investors
- Connecticut HF Manager Illegally Diverted Investor Money - Now Owes Nearly $13Mn
- White House Cleaning House of Advisors Without Full Security Clearance
- Goldman Projects 30% Growth in Wealth Management Advisor Force
- Whistleblower Alleges Manipulation of CBOE Volatility Index
- FINRA Looking Into VIX (CBOE Volatility Index) Manipulation: WSJ
- Atlanta-Area Resident Charged with Misusing Investor Funds - SEC
- FINRA Announces 2018 West Region Networking Seminar
- Alberto Arevalo, Associate Director in Office of International Affairs, to Retire From SEC
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Rules & Regulations
The State of Financial Regulation Under the Trump Administration
[Photo of Paul Volcker]
by Howard Haykin
So, the Trump administration released a report that recommends a dialing back of banking rules. To the surprise of some, the report did not seek to eliminate Dodd-Frank’s Volcker Rule, which forbids proprietary trading at big banks. And it's interesting to note that the release came one business day after the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule for retirement advisers went into effect (Friday, 6/9). All in all, a mixed bag that disappoints some people on both sides of the aisle.
BloombergView columnist Matt Levine offers logical rationale for why things went down as they did.
- Like it or not, there was significant support for provisions of the rules that addressed public concerns:
► retirement brokers were too conflicted, and their commission-based economic model encouraged them to recommend bad expensive products that paid them kickbacks.
► banks had become too risk-loving, and they were dominated by traders who got outsized rewards for taking on big risks
- Banks and brokerage firms had already changed their business models in response to the rules:
► Most brokerage firms have changed their business models largely away from commission-based compensation.
► Big banks have largely transitioned away from proprietary trading, though some indications of prop trading appear now and then.
- While no one in the Trump administration seems to have wanted the rule, this administration failed to appoint senior officials to the Labor Department who might have been capable of unwinding a major regulation so close to its implementation.
- Eventually these rules are can be repealed or their overly restrictive provisions can be dialed down - though that may be more easily said than done, for the following reasons:
► Both rules are aimed at changing the culture of the industries that they cover – and this appears to have been happened at brokerage firms and big banks.
► The longer these financial institutions operate within the bounds of such new cultures, the harder it will be for them to revert to the old business models.
Buckle up - it looks like we're in for a bumpy ride!