BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- New Cyberattack Goes Global, Hits WPP, Rosneft, Maersk
- Deutsche Bank Said to Lose as Much as $60Mn Over Derivative Trade
- Dimon Says JPMorgan Headcount to Keep Rising Despite Automation
- RBS to Cut 443 Jobs In UK, Move Many of Them to India
- Deutsche Bank Bullish on London Despite Brexit
- Supreme Court Nears Finish With Big Cases, Retirement Rumors
- The Richest Person in Every State
- LPL Tabs Scott Seese, Former eBay Exec, as Chief Information Officer
- Fired Biglaw Associate Arrested for Trying to Extort Partners
- Canada's CIBC Completes $5Bn PrivateBancorp Buy
- Word ‘Women’ Literally Never Appears in U.S. Senate’s 142-Page Health-Care Bill
- Stephen Pierce, Goldman Sachs Global Head of Equity Markets, To Retire
- Al Gore 'Not Very Smart,’ But Became Filthy Rich Using Simple Investing Formula - Charlie Munger
- U.S. Regulators, Lawmakers Support Volcker Rule Revamp at Hearing
- Morgan Stanley Opts for Frankfurt as New EU Hub
- A New Risk for Goldman, Morgan Stanley in Stress Tests (subsc reqd)
- A Trump Bump for Law Firm of President’s Lawyer - Kasowitz Benson Torres
- JPMorgan, BofA, Goldman, Citi, Wells Fargo Pass Fed's Stress Test
- Blackstone Stock Still Trading at $31 - Its IPO Price From 10 Years Ago
- NJ Resident and NY-Based Global FX Club Charged with Solicitation Fraud, Misappropriation - CFTC
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Rules & Regulations
The State of Financial Regulation Under the Trump Administration
[Photo of Paul Volcker]
by Howard Haykin
So, the Trump administration released a report that recommends a dialing back of banking rules. To the surprise of some, the report did not seek to eliminate Dodd-Frank’s Volcker Rule, which forbids proprietary trading at big banks. And it's interesting to note that the release came one business day after the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule for retirement advisers went into effect (Friday, 6/9). All in all, a mixed bag that disappoints some people on both sides of the aisle.
BloombergView columnist Matt Levine offers logical rationale for why things went down as they did.
- Like it or not, there was significant support for provisions of the rules that addressed public concerns:
► retirement brokers were too conflicted, and their commission-based economic model encouraged them to recommend bad expensive products that paid them kickbacks.
► banks had become too risk-loving, and they were dominated by traders who got outsized rewards for taking on big risks
- Banks and brokerage firms had already changed their business models in response to the rules:
► Most brokerage firms have changed their business models largely away from commission-based compensation.
► Big banks have largely transitioned away from proprietary trading, though some indications of prop trading appear now and then.
- While no one in the Trump administration seems to have wanted the rule, this administration failed to appoint senior officials to the Labor Department who might have been capable of unwinding a major regulation so close to its implementation.
- Eventually these rules are can be repealed or their overly restrictive provisions can be dialed down - though that may be more easily said than done, for the following reasons:
► Both rules are aimed at changing the culture of the industries that they cover – and this appears to have been happened at brokerage firms and big banks.
► The longer these financial institutions operate within the bounds of such new cultures, the harder it will be for them to revert to the old business models.
Buckle up - it looks like we're in for a bumpy ride!