BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- Goldman's Lloyd Blankfein Seems to be Making a Habit Out of Trolling Trump
- Goldman on Hunt for Star Traders to Revive Struggling Commodities Unit
- Yahoo Owes Millions for Busting NCAA Tourney Bracket Deal
- JPMorgan Joins 21st Century Fox in Fighting 'Deep Divisions Across Our Country'
- Please, God, Save Gary Cohn From Himself: The Case for Resigning
- Regulatory Considerations When Bringing on a New Advisor
- Why Deutsche Bank is at Mercy of Regulators
- U.S. Treasury Auction Class-Action – Federal Judge Causes Interminable Delay
- Mnuchin Rejects Calls to Resign and Defends Trump
- Best Time to Go to the U.S. (Tennis) Open Tourney - Before It Starts on August 28
- Stifel Prevails in Arbitration But Ex-Hilltop Employees Hit with Awards - Bill Singer
- Banca IMI Securities to Pay $35Mn for Improper Handling of ADRs in Continuing SEC Crackdown
- Members of White House ‘Arts Panel’ Resign En Masse in Protest of Trump
- FINRA Whiffs on Disciplinary Sanction: Bill Singer's 'Negligent Market Manipulation in OTC Stock Promotion'
- Heather Heyer’s Mother Says, ‘I’m Not Talking to the President’
- Goldman Sachs May Have Lost $100Mn on Energy Bet Gone Wrong
- SEC Drops Case Against Ex-JPMorgan Traders Over 'London Whale'
- Financial Advisers That Invest in Technology Need to Accomplish These Two Things
- FINRA Amends Codes Regarding Expedited Arbitrator List Selection
- FINRA July 2017 Quarterly Disciplinary Review (Podcast)
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Wells Fargo’s $110Mn Class Action Settlement – Does This Sound Cheap?
Wells Fargo announced that it has agreed to pay $110 million (after attorneys’ fees) to settle a class-action lawsuit relating to the 2 million or so accounts that bank employees opened without customer permission, going back to 2009. Under terms of the settlement, Wells Fargo would also waive its right to take customers into ‘third-party’ arbitration. This settlement, which is subject to court approval, would apparently resolve 11 other pending class-action lawsuits filed against Wells Fargo in this matter.
It’s the first private settlement that Wells Fargo has reached since September 2016, when the bank agreed to pay $185 million in fines to settle to charges filed by federal and California authorities. And then there’s $3.2 million in payments that tge babnk has already made customers who reportedly had 130,000 accounts opened without their permission. In most cases, these customers (who received a remediation check) will be eligible to take part in the $110million settlement.
“We want to ensure that each customer impacted by our sales practices issue has every opportunity for remediation, and this agreement presents an additional option. We continue to encourage customers to contact us directly so that we can act quickly to refund fees and address any concerns.” - - Wells Fargo CEO Tim Sloan, in a statement.
HOW DOES THE SETTLEMENT BENEFIT CUSTOMERS? A lawyer with Keller Rohrback, one of the firms that filed the class-action suit against Wells Fargo praised the settlement: “We believe this is an outstanding result obtained for the benefit of a proposed nationwide class, notwithstanding Wells Fargo’s effort to block the class action with an arbitration clause.”
Really? The numbers on the table seem rather low for remediation to customers- at least to this layman’s eyes. Let’s work out the numbers: $110Mn among 2,000,000 accounts equals $55 per account; $3.2Mn payouts for 130,000 accounts equals $25 per account.
How might that begin to compensate customers who have endured credit rating problems, or customers who worried needlessly and spent untold hours to process account closures?
Of course, the bank faces additional legal obstacles –regulatory and criminal investigations, and lawsuits by investors and former employees. All these may result in significantly higher payments by the bank. But of course, they would not necessarily end up in the pockets of customers – who, along with fired employees, have borne the greatest losses in the entire scandal.
We welcome your comments – critical or supporting.