BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Investments - Private
- Rules & Regulations
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- Wall Street News
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Investments - Unsuitable
Cold Caller: Pas De Deux
[Photo: Sleeping Beauty Ballet / Royal Opera House]
by Howard Haykin
While “Broker #1” was engaging in a high-cost, in-and-out trading strategy that cost 16 of his customers over $800,000 [see Financialish], “Broker #2” was conducting a parallel fraud. And all this took place at the Mineola, NY-based main office of broker-dealer Joseph Stone Capital.
According to the SEC, from 2015 to 2019, Broker #2 traded in and out of his 12 customers’ accounts so rapidly that stock positions were held on average for fewer than 15 days - which facilitated Broker 2’s efforts to generate trading compensation. He also did that by applying excessive commissions, mark-ups, and mark-downs, and by affixing a $75 ‘postage’ fee to every trade. By the time Broker #2 was barred from the industry, his customers had experienced cumulative losses of $741,000, while he had received $265,000 in commissions and fees.
FIRMS WITH THE MOST TAINTED BROKERS. Interestingly, a 2017 investigative study identified Joseph Stone Capital as having the 2nd highest (worst) concentration of brokers with serious public disclosures - among all registered broker-dealers. That study, conducted by Reuters, provided statistics for the 48 brokerage firms whose broker ranks were the most highly populated with registered persons who, at the time, had been flagged by regulators for irregularities.
‘FINRA flags’ are incidents that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority requires brokers to publicly disclose - including customer disputes, disciplinary actions and employee terminations for cause. At Joseph Stone Capital, 71% of its 59 brokers had 'FINRA flags' on their records.
Yet, despite the questionable track record of its brokers, along with the 2 recent cases cited by Financialish, there's nothing to indicate that the SEC or FINRA ever held Joseph Stone Capital or any of its supervisory principals accountable in these alleged frauds – e.g., charging them with failing to adequately supervise the conduct of its brokers. One possible explanation is that Broker #1 and Broker #2 (and other brokers) falsely coded their customers as having “Speculative” or “Aggressive” Investment Profiles - which, to some degree, might have 'provided excuses' for excessive trading. Of course, that last statement is pure conjecture.
[For further details, click on … SEC Administrative Order and Broker #2’s CRD Record.]
[To read about Reuters' Investigation, click on ... Wall Street’s self-regulator blocks public scrutiny of firms with tainted brokers.]