BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Merrill’s Slip of the Tongue Costs it $42 Million
by Howard Haykin
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith agreed to pay a $42 million fine and admit wrongdoing to settle SEC charges that it misled customers about how it handled their orders.
SEC FINDINGS. Over a 5-year period – from 2008 to 2013 - Merrill Lynch falsely informed customers that it had executed millions of orders internally when it actually had routed them for execution at other broker-dealers and execution venues. Merrill Lynch called this practice “masking.”
Merrill Lynch would receive equity orders from its “Direct Strategy Access,” or “DSA,” customers - typically financial institutions such as asset managers, mutual fund investment advisers, and public pension funds. Merrill typically would slice them into smaller “child orders" that it routed to various trading centers – including exchanges, Alternative Trading Systems (ATSs) and External Liquidity Provider, or “ELPs.”
To mask the external execution venue, Merrill Lynch programmed a system that provided automated messages to customers regarding each trade to report, falsely, that the execution venue was Merrill Lynch and not an ELP. Merrill Lynch similarly misreported ELP executions in reports provided to customers and in billing invoices. Further, when responding to customer questionnaires and in other communications, Merrill Lynch specifically omitted ELPs from lists of venues to which customer orders were routed.
By masking the broker-dealers who had executed customers’ orders, Merrill Lynch made itself appear to be a more active trading center and reduced access fees it typically paid to exchanges.
By the time it stopped masking in May 2013, Merrill Lynch had falsely reported over 15 million child orders, comprising more than five billion shares.
[For further details, click on SEC Order.]