BROWSE BY TOPIC
- Bad Brokers
- Compliance Concepts
- Investor Protection
- Investments - Unsuitable
- Investments - Strategies
- Wall Street News
- Investments - Private
- Rules & Regulations
- Bad Advisors
- Boiler Rooms
- Terminations/Cost Cutting
- General News
- Donald Trump & Co.
- Regulatory Sanctions
- Big Banks
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Rules & Regulations
Push to Rescind the CFPB Arbitration Rule is a Seesaw Battle
Two months ago, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, rolled out a new rule that banned financial companies from using mandatory arbitration clauses that deny groups of people the right to join together and sue their bank or financial company for wrongdoing.
"Arbitration clauses in contracts for products like bank accounts and credit cards make it nearly impossible for people to take companies to court when things go wrong. These clauses allow companies to avoid accountability by blocking group lawsuits and forcing people to go it alone or give up. Our new rule will stop companies from sidestepping the courts and ensure that people who are harmed together can take action together." - - CFPB Director Richard Cordray
Since then, a royal battle has raged over whether Congress should vote to repeal the CFPB arbitration rule.
Supporters of the rule say that any vote to kill the CFPB rule would be tantamount to a “get out of jail free” card for large financial institutions. Another way of describing such a move by Congress would be to say it's tantamount to "The Wells Fargo Immunity Act” - because none of the millions of defrauded Wells Fargo customers would ever get their day in court if the rule is repealed.
Of course, one the other side of the argument, detractors of the CFPB arbitration rule, like Ted Frank and his Competitive Enterprise Institute [see WSP OpEd, 9/7], claim the CFPB arbitration rule is (pure and simple) a boon to class-action attorneys who collect fees that often are billed out at thousands of dollars an hour. And, Congressional leaders, such as Mike Crapo (R-ID) - who chairs the Senate Banking Committee - remain optimistic that the CFPB rule can and will be repealed. However, it may be difficult for Crapo to find Senate floor time to pass such a repeal vote, given so many other pressing issues before Congress.
IMPACT OF EQUIFAX ON THE DISCUSSION. The issue of the massive breach at Equifax, the credit rating bureau, has entered into the CFPB arbitration rule discussion. Many say the Equifax revelations may have come at exactly the wrong time for Republicans, who had been hoping as late as last Thursday to rapidly push ahead this week on a vote to overturn the rule. Under the Congressional Review Act, Republicans just need a majority vote to repeal a rule within 60 legislative days.
Yet, the accompanying negative publicity seems to have given rise to supporters of the CFPB rule, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who say that the CFPB’s arbitration rule is essential because it “would stop companies like Equifax from avoiding legal accountability like this – as long as [the] GOP doesn’t reverse it.” [see American Banker, 9/8]
Interestingly enough, Ballard and Spahr [see The National Law Review, 9/11] counters by saying that the Senate should disregard any argument that the cybersecurity breach is "a prime example of why class actions are needed to protect consumers." The firm's stated reason is that, "while the CFPB arbitration rule covers some credit reporting company activities, it does not appear to cover data breaches such as this one. Therefore, the Equifax data breach has nothing to do with the CFPB arbitration rule. In any event, the issue appears to be moot, since according to published reports Equifax has stated that it will not seek to apply its on-line arbitration clause and class action waiver to claims based on the data breach itself."