Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

 

 

 

 

BROWSE BY TOPIC

ABOUT FINANCIALISH

We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.

 

Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.

 

SUBSCRIBE FOR
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS

FOLLOW US

Compliance Concepts

SEC Issues RIA Risk Alert: Five Most Frequent Compliance Topics in SEC Exams

February 9, 2017

The SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (“OCIE”) published a list of the five compliance topics most frequently identified in deficiency letters that were sent to SEC-registered investment advisers.

 

Below are the 5 topics, which essentially are the bulk of advisor compliance requirements. What’s most relevant are the (bulleted) examples within each of the 5 topics.

 

(1)  Compliance Rule  [Rule 206(4)-7 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940]   

 

  • Compliance manuals are not reasonably tailored to the adviser’s business practices.
  • Annual reviews are not performed or did not address the adequacy of the adviser’s policies and procedures.
  • Adviser does not follow compliance policies and procedures.
  • Compliance manuals are not current.

 

(2)  Regulatory Filings

 

  • Inaccurate disclosures
  • Untimely amendments to Form ADVs
  • Incorrect and untimely Form PF filings
  • Incorrect and untimely Form D filings

 

(3)  Custody Rule [Rule 206(4)-2]

 

  • Advisers did not recognize that they may have custody due to online access to client accounts.
  • Advisers with custody obtained surprise examinations that do not meet the requirements of the Custody Rule.
  • Advisers did not recognize that they may have custody as a result of certain authority over client accounts.

 

(4)  Code of Ethics Rule [Rule 204A-1]

 

  • Access persons not identified
  • Codes of ethics missing required information
  • Untimely submission of transactions and holdings.
  • No description of code of ethics in Form ADVs

 

(5)  Books & Records Rule [Rule 204-2]

 

  • Did not maintain all required records.
  • Books and records are inaccurate or not updated.
  • Inconsistent recordkeeping.