BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Summit Brokerage Had Lax Supervision Over Excessive Trading and Consolidated Reports
by Howard Haykin
WHAT WENT WRONG – EXCESSIVE TRADING. From January 2012 through March 2017, Summit failed to adequately supervise its Registered Representatives (“RRs”), particularly for potential excessive trading.
Over those 5 years, Summit employed between 3 and 6 compliance principals who were supposed to utilize trade alerts provided by Summit's clearing firms to review registered reps’ trading activity. However, a number of trade alerts that were relevant to identifying excessive trading - including alerts related to turnover and cost-to-equity ratios in commission-based accounts - were not provided to the compliance principals. Instead, the compliance principals relied on a strictly manual review of the blotter to identify potential excessive trading.
As a result, these manual reviews of the trade blotter did not identify that one RR ("CJ") excessively traded 14 customers' accounts. For example, …
- CJ recommended 267 trades over a 3-year period in the account of a retired woman, whose net worth was less than $500,000. That customer ended up paying >$61,000 in commissions and her annualized cost-to-equity ratios exceeded 27%.
- CJ placed 533 trades over a 3-year period in the account of a retired woman whose net worth was less than $1 million. That customer paid >$171,000 in commissions and her cost-to-equity ratios exceeded 32%.
- CJ excessively traded in the accounts of 14 customers, and that trading generated more than 150 alerts for potentially excessive turnover rates and cost-to-equity ratios. The Firm received those alerts, but, as discussed above, no one at the Firm reviewed them. And collectively, these 14 customers paid $651,405 in commissions during the 5-year period, and they suffered realized losses of more than $300,000.
WHAT WENT WRONG – CONSOLIDATED REPORTS. From June 2015 through March 2018, Summit failed to adequately supervise its RRs in the creation and dissemination of consolidated reports – documents that present information about most or all of a customer's financial holdings, including assets held away from the firm.
During that 3-year period, while Summit’s WSPs prohibited RRs from sending customers consolidated reports unless they used a template that had been reviewed and approved by the Firm's compliance department, the firm did not have a reasonable system to track whether its RRs complied with these procedures prior to sending consolidated reports to customers. As it turned out, …
- Of the 103 RRs who sent consolidated reports to their customers during this period, only 8 submitted templates to the Firm's compliance department for prior review and approval.
- Of the remaining 95 RRs, 15 violated Summit’s prohibition by disseminating consolidated reports that were generated by unapproved 3rd-party vendors.
- And one consolidated report distributed by an RR materially misstated the value of a customer's investment.
For further details on ‘Consolidated Reports’ and supervisory issues pertaining to these documents, click on FINRA Regulatory Notice 10-19.
For further details on this case, click on ... FINRA AWC #2016052655301.