BROWSE BY TOPIC
Stories of Interest
- Sarah ten Siethoff is New Associate Director of SEC Investment Management Rulemaking Office
- Catherine Keating Appointed CEO of BNY Mellon Wealth Management
- Credit Suisse to Pay $47Mn to Resolve DOJ Asia Probe
- SEC Chair Clayton Goes 'Hat in Hand' Before Congress on 2019 Budget Request
- SEC's Opening Remarks to the Elder Justice Coordinating Council
- Massachusetts Jury Convicts CA Attorney of Securities Fraud
- Deutsche Bank Says 3 Senior Investment Bankers to Leave Firm
- World’s Biggest Hedge Fund Reportedly ‘Bearish On Financial Assets’
- SEC Fines Constant Contact, Popular Email Marketer, for Overstating Subscriber Numbers
- SocGen Agrees to Pay $1.3 Billion to End Libya, Libor Probes
- Cryptocurrency Exchange Bitfinex Briefly Halts Trading After Cyber Attack
- SEC Names Valerie Szczepanik Senior Advisor for Digital Assets and Innovation
- SEC Modernizes Delivery of Fund Reports, Seeks Public Feedback on Improving Fund Disclosure
- NYSE Says SEC Plan to Limit Exchange Rebates Would Hurt Investors
- Deutsche Bank faces another challenge with Fed stress test
- Former JPMorgan Broker Files racial discrimination suit against company
- $3.3Mn Winning Bid for Lunch with Warren Buffett
- Julie Erhardt is SEC's New Acting Chief Risk Officer
- Chyhe Becker is SEC's New Acting Chief Economist, Acting Director of Economic and Risk Analysis Division
- Getting a Handle on Virtual Currencies - FINRA
We seek to provide information, insights and direction that may enable the Financial Community to effectively and efficiently operate in a regulatory risk-free environment by curating content from all over the web.
Stay Informed with the latest fanancialish news.
NEWSLETTERS & ALERTS
Wide Scale Proxy Voting Fraud Took Down Firm, But Not Senior Management
by Howard Haykin
It’s a somewhat confounding case. Realty Capital Securities (“RCS”), a broker-dealer, was charged in November 2015 with violating Massachusetts securities laws when certain of its brokers participated in a proxy voting fraud. The brokers, it seems, submitted fake proxy votes in connection with 2015 annual shareholder meetings of certain investment funds sponsored by American Realty Capital (“ARC”), an affiliate of the broker-dealer.
In early December RCS agreed to pay a $3 million fine and terminate its Massachusetts securities license in order to settle the Massachusetts charges. By January 2016, RCS shuttered its door when it withdrew its broker-dealer registration with the SEC. [Click on NYTimes, 12/2/15]
Yet, Massachusetts regulator William Galvin wasn’t finished. In June 2016, the securities regulator fined 7 other broker-dealers a total of $238,000 because their brokers worked with RCS brokers in submitting unauthorized proxy votes for the ARC-sponsored nontraded REITs. Those firms were: (i) Voya Financial Advisors; (ii) FMN Capital Corp; (iii) Invest Financial Corp.; (iv) Newbridge Securities; (v) Pariter Securities; (vi) Platinum Wealth Partners; and, (vii) TKG Financial.
WHICH BRINGS US TO THE VEXING QUESTION. Having presented a proxy voting scam so egregious that a broker-dealer paid a $3 million fine and shut down its operations, how then is it possible that just a handful of lower level registered reps / wholesalers were charged in the ‘crime’?
- In the nearby Financialish post, ‘Newbie Broker Gets 2-Year Suspension After Impersonating Fund Shareholders’, we see that FINRA issued a 2-year sanction against a newly-minted rep who participated in the proxy voting fraud by impersonating shareholders of the investment funds.
- In recent articles in other publications, we learn that at least 2 other RCS brokers were alleged to have taken part in the proxy fraud. However, both individuals refused to cooperate with FINRA investigators and were barred from the industry.
Yet, nowhere else could I find any records to indicate that principals or senior management of RCS were ever sanctioned in connection with this case. From FINRA's BrokerCheck records, I was able to identify RCS's CFO, COO and CCO during the Relevant Period. But none had any disciplinary disclosures in their files.
FINANCIALISH TAKE AWAYS. It once again adds up to frustration with FINRA and other regulators. Are regulators afraid to hold managerial and supervisory types responsible for violative actions at their financial services firms? When did regulators stop referring to the “KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN” standard for judging negligence?
More importantly, when will regulators return to the “KNEW OR SHOULD HAVE KNOWN” standard?